<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:ccmbenchmark="https://www.ccmbenchmark.com/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title>Philippe Guilbert : Dernier contenus</title><link>/account/philippe-guilbert-25722</link><atom:link href="/account/philippe-guilbert-25722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><language>fr</language><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:49:04 +0200</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 09:49:04 +0200</lastBuildDate><item><title>La webperf comparée de 11 sites du secteur e-tourisme</title><link>https://www.journaldunet.com/solutions/dsi/1197369-la-webperf-comparee-de-11-sites-du-secteur-e-tourisme/</link><description><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.journaldunet.com/solutions/dsi/1197369-la-webperf-comparee-de-11-sites-du-secteur-e-tourisme/"><img src="https://img-0.journaldunet.com/sG0yeoEN1wkZBqtOE5CDEh71dQw=/100x/smart/b1530f66b0754910a8b0ba6dd379d670/ccmcms-jdn/10021056-anonyme-anonyme.png" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="0"></a>Logiquement, on pourrait s’attendre à ce que ce marché ultra-concurrentiel soit dominé par des sites web aux performances particulièrement aiguisées. Les résultats sont globalement décevants.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:48:41 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://www.journaldunet.com/solutions/dsi/1197369-la-webperf-comparee-de-11-sites-du-secteur-e-tourisme/</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Philippe Guilbert]]></dc:creator><ccmbenchmark:content_author><![CDATA[Philippe Guilbert]]></ccmbenchmark:content_author><ccmbenchmark:content_author_company><![CDATA[DAREBOOST]]></ccmbenchmark:content_author_company><ccmbenchmark:content_author_illustration>1</ccmbenchmark:content_author_illustration></item></channel></rss>