<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:ccmbenchmark="https://www.ccmbenchmark.com/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><channel><title>Roberto Di Cosmo : Dernier contenus</title><link>/account/roberto-di-cosmo-248</link><atom:link href="/account/roberto-di-cosmo-248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><language>fr</language><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 19:57:18 +0200</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 19:57:18 +0200</lastBuildDate><item><title>Machines à voter : la mauvaise solution à un faux problème</title><link>https://www.journaldunet.com/solutions/reseau-social-d-entreprise/1032995-machines-a-voter-la-mauvaise-solution-a-un-faux-probleme/</link><description><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.journaldunet.com/solutions/reseau-social-d-entreprise/1032995-machines-a-voter-la-mauvaise-solution-a-un-faux-probleme/"><img src="https://img-0.journaldunet.com/6S5T6cOHTqLRwNGSP-vsF0CRVYQ=/100x/smart/a5a2ad3063e140408f97798ddaa6da31/user-jdn/10113.jpg" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="0"></a>Comment garantir l'anonymat et, dans le même temps, la possibilité de vérifier publiquement le résultat ? Après l'expérience du 22 avril, difficile de comprendre le maintien des machines à voter.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:08:53 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://www.journaldunet.com/solutions/reseau-social-d-entreprise/1032995-machines-a-voter-la-mauvaise-solution-a-un-faux-probleme/</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Roberto Di Cosmo]]></dc:creator><ccmbenchmark:content_author><![CDATA[Roberto Di Cosmo]]></ccmbenchmark:content_author><ccmbenchmark:content_author_company><![CDATA[Universite Paris VII]]></ccmbenchmark:content_author_company><ccmbenchmark:content_author_illustration>1</ccmbenchmark:content_author_illustration></item></channel></rss>